if one studies the bible and approach the subject objectively will be surprised to know that the established truths of the churches since centuries are preposterous, absurd and puerile false. for, which they are used. they must stand by their meaning direct and plain to be understood. that the original words in the bible need not be rephrased, or hidden in group of words that convey different meaning. remember that almighty god (allah), the creator, is the ultimate truth: he is not the author of confusion.

"father" or "father abraham". equally inconceivable is that david (pbuh) would use the appellation  "my lord"  for any of his descendants, for whom, too, the usual term would be  "son" and "my son". thus, if it was jesus (pbuh) who was referred to as  "my lord", clearly prophet david (pbuh) should have said:  "the lord said to”my son”",  because prophet jesus (pbuh) was his descendant, he could not say that he was his son.

of course, the pharisees (jewish rabbins) and commentators of the old testament understood  "my lord" to be the messiah  (jesus) who would descend from david (pbuh) himself. hence, they replied to the question put to them by jesus (pbuh) as quoted in mathew (22:41 and 42) and from the other gospels. but, prophet jesus (pbuh) flatly repudiated the jews when he asked them a second question in mathew (22:43 – 45):  he said to them,  ”how is it then david, speaking by the spirit, calls him "lord"? if then david calls him "lord", how he can be his son?”